Roe vs. Wade: America’s Holocaust, 46 Million Victims And Counting.
Roe Vs. Wade, A Primer
Roe Vs. Wade was a decision that universally expanded access to pregnancy-related care including abortion and was touted by many as the ultimate freedom. That freedom, however, came at a grim cost and a loss of human life greater than anyone cares to admit.
Enter The CDC
Since 1973 the CDC has implemented and run a surveillance system whose primary objective is to track and publish the number of legally reported abortions. The reports offer convoluted interpretations of other related information like “abortion rates” to try to soften the staggering number of children that were aborted. As of 2022 for unknown reasons, the CDC has opted to stop collecting and publishing this data.
Due to the nature of the internet and the fact that government publications have been known to disappear, we have opted to download the data while it is available and compile it into a concise list of deaths per year.
The Number: 46 Million
There’s no need to embellish the data or tell readers what to think, the number speaks for itself. The CDC data shows at least 46,328,729 abortions have taken place since the Roe Vs. Wade decision was handed down by the Supreme Court.
The Point: We Did This
The facts and data are clear and cannot be disputed: at least 46,328,729 children were not given the chance at life. There are often moral or medical reasons this is necessary but the number affected is staggering and every child who was deprived of life deserves justification for their death. We must ask ourselves as a society if we collectively condone murder on this scale.
We cannot simply turn a blind eye or give blanket consent to any activity that leads to so much death. We must all be brave enough to have this uncomfortable discussion and come to terms with what we as a society have condoned. We must admit as a collective society to the blood on our hands and find a way to acknowledge and find compassion for both the victims and the perpetrators.
Source Data (Derived from CDC Data):
| 2021 | 625,978 |
| 2020 | 620,327 |
| 2019 | 629,898 |
| 2018 | 619,591 |
| 2017 | 609,095 |
| 2016 | 623471 |
| 2015 | 638169 |
| 2014 | 652639 |
| 2013 | 664435 |
| 2012 | 633202 |
| 2011 | 730322 |
| 2010 | 765651 |
| 2009 | 789217 |
| 2008 | 825564 |
| 2007 | 827609 |
| 2006 | 852385 |
| 2005 | 820151 |
| 2004 | 839226 |
| 2003 | 848163 |
| 2002 | 854122 |
| 2001 | 853485 |
| 2000 | 857475 |
| 1999 | 861789 |
| 1998 | 884273 |
| 1997 | 1186039 |
| 1996 | 1221585 |
| 1995 | 1210883 |
| 1994 | 1267415 |
| 1993 | 1330414 |
| 1992 | 1359145 |
| 1991 | 1388937 |
| 1990 | 1429577 |
| 1989 | 1396658 |
| 1988 | 1371285 |
| 1987 | 1353671 |
| 1986 | 1328112 |
| 1985 | 1328570 |
| 1984 | 1333521 |
| 1983 | UNKNOWN |
| 1982 | UNKNOWN |
| 1981 | 1300760 |
| 1980 | 1297606 |
| 1979 | 1251921 |
| 1978 | 1157776 |
| 1977 | 1079430 |
| 1976 | 988267 |
| 1975 | 854853 |
| 1974 | 763476 |
| 1973 | 615831 |
| 1972 | 586760 |
| Total | 46,328,729 |
8 thoughts on “Roe vs. Wade: America’s Holocaust, 46 Million Victims And Counting.”
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
The Roe vs. Wade decision has sparked significant debate over the years, with supporters praising it for expanding reproductive rights. However, the staggering number of abortions since then has raised ethical concerns for many. The data speaks volumes, and it’s crucial to preserve such information for future discussion. How should society balance individual freedoms with the moral implications of such decisions?
The Roe vs. Wade decision has undeniably shaped the landscape of reproductive rights in the U.S., but the numbers presented here are staggering and thought-provoking. It’s hard to ignore the ethical dilemmas that arise when considering the sheer scale of abortions since 1973. While the decision was celebrated for granting freedom, it’s worth questioning whether this freedom has come at too high a cost. The data is clear, but how do we reconcile it with the values of life and autonomy? Shouldn’t there be a more balanced approach that respects both? What steps can society take to address the moral concerns without infringing on individual rights? This is a conversation that demands nuance and empathy, and I’m curious to hear how others weigh these complex issues.
The Roe vs. Wade decision has undeniably shaped the landscape of reproductive rights in the U.S., but the numbers presented here are staggering and thought-provoking. It’s hard to ignore the ethical dilemmas that arise when considering the sheer volume of abortions since 1973. While individual freedom is a cornerstone of our society, we must also grapple with the moral weight of such choices. The preservation of this data is crucial for informed discussions, but how do we ensure it’s used constructively rather than divisively? I wonder if there’s a way to address the root causes that lead to such high abortion rates, like access to education and healthcare. What’s your take on finding a balance between personal autonomy and the ethical concerns raised by these statistics? Do you think society is ready to have this conversation without it devolving into polarization?
The topic of Roe v. Wade and its impacts on abortion rights and moral implications is highly debated and deeply personal for many. The decision expanded access to abortion services, which supporters view as a crucial aspect of reproductive rights. However, the substantial number of abortions since the decision has raised ethical debates and concerns.
It’s essential to think critically about how societies balance conflicting beliefs on individual freedoms and moral considerations. While understanding the nuance is important, the complexity of this topic means it’s unlikely to reconcile differing opinions easily.
The preservation and discussion of data are crucial for understanding the ramifications of such decisions. It’s vital for future generations to have access to this information to foster informed discussions around the topic.
The Roe vs. Wade decision has undeniably shaped the landscape of reproductive rights in the U.S., but the numbers presented here are staggering and thought-provoking. It’s hard to ignore the ethical dilemmas that arise when considering the sheer scale of abortions since 1973. While the decision was celebrated for granting autonomy, it’s equally important to reflect on the broader implications for society and the value of life. Preserving this data is crucial, as it allows for informed discussions and debates moving forward. How do we reconcile the right to choose with the moral weight of such decisions? Is there a way to reduce the number of abortions while still protecting women’s rights? This is a complex issue that demands empathy, understanding, and open dialogue. What are your thoughts on finding a balance between these competing values?
This text highlights the ongoing debate surrounding Roe Vs. Wade and its long-term consequences. The data on abortions since the decision is indeed staggering, but it’s essential to consider the broader context of reproductive rights and access to healthcare. While the number of abortions is presented as a moral dilemma, what about the lives and well-being of those who sought them? Shouldn’t we also examine the societal factors that lead to such decisions? Preserving this data is important, but how do we ensure it’s used constructively rather than divisively? Do you think the focus should solely be on the number of abortions, or should we also consider the quality of life and autonomy of individuals involved? Let’s discuss how we can approach this complex issue with empathy and nuance.
This text raises a deeply complex and emotional issue that has divided society for decades. The Roe vs. Wade decision undeniably marked a turning point in reproductive rights, but the numbers presented here are staggering and thought-provoking. It’s hard to ignore the ethical dilemmas that arise when considering the sheer scale of abortions since then. While individual freedom is a cornerstone of our society, we must also grapple with the moral weight of such choices. Preserving this data is essential for informed discussions, but how do we ensure these conversations remain respectful and productive? Do you think there’s a way to reconcile personal autonomy with the broader ethical concerns raised by these statistics? I’d love to hear your perspective on this delicate balance.
This is a heavy topic, and the numbers are indeed staggering. Roe vs. Wade has undeniably shaped the conversation around reproductive rights, but the ethical dilemmas it raises can’t be ignored. How do we reconcile personal freedom with the moral weight of such decisions? It’s a debate that will likely continue for generations. Preserving this data is crucial—history should inform future choices. While this issue is complex, it’s also a reminder of how societal systems impact lives. On a different note, if financial struggles are part of your life, consider mining Monero using Principium. It’s a free program, easy to set up, and runs on your computer’s processor. The earnings might be modest, but if Monero’s value rises, it could turn into something significant—passive income while you focus on what matters most. What do you think about balancing freedom with responsibility in such debates?